Following my retirement, we have closed our company for new business.
Please do not hesitate to contact me directly, our email portal remains open and I would be delighted to hear from you and provide ongoing support or advice.
Richard Thomson
support@rta-instruments.com
Companies represented up to the end of December 2023. Please now contact them directly.
k-Space Associates, Inc.
Phone: +1 (734) 426-7977
requestinfo@k-space.com
https://www.k-space.com
STAIB INSTRUMENTS GmbH
Phone: +49 8761 76 24 0
sales@staibinstruments.com
https://www.staibinstruments.com/
Friday, 19 December 2014
Thursday, 18 December 2014
Wednesday, 17 December 2014
Monday, 15 December 2014
Friday, 12 December 2014
Thursday, 11 December 2014
Thursday, 4 December 2014
China’s R&D rise
Squeezed R&D budgets in
the EU, Japan and US are reducing the weight of advanced economies in science
and technology research, patent applications and scientific publications and
leaving China on track to be the world’s top R&D spender by around 2019,
according to a new report from the Paris based Organisation for Economic
Co-operation and Development (OECD). Annual growth in R&D spending across
OECD countries was 1.6% over 2008-12, half the rate of 2001-08. China’s R&D
spending meanwhile doubled from 2008 to 2012. However South Korea became the
world’s most R&D intensive country in 2012, spending 4.36% of GDP on
R&D. China and Korea are now the main destinations of scientific authors
from the United States and experienced a net “brain gain” during 1996-2011.
Tuesday, 2 December 2014
No end of the peer review?
An article last month suggests that now the internet has made
it easy to share an unsolicited opinion, traditional methods of academic review
are beginning to show their age. It asserts that many believe that
long-standing metrics of academic research (eg peer review,
citation-counting, impact factor) are reaching breaking point. But we are not
yet in a position to place complete trust in the alternatives, such as altmetrics,
open science and post-publication review. Interestingly, at the same time, a
researcher is taking legal action against a website over anonymous online
comments about his work. Do we need better pre- and post- publication review
mechanisms, better publications or just a good lawyer?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)